California Legal Brief

AI-Generated Practitioner Briefs of California Appellate Opinions

issue preclusion

2 opinions tagged “issue preclusion”

Sorokunov v. NetApp, Inc. 3/3/26 CA1/4

The Rule of Sorokunov v. NetApp is that an arbitration award finding that a plaintiff did not suffer individual Labor Code violations can preclude the same plaintiff from claiming standing as an "aggrieved employee" in a PAGA action based on the identical violations, under circumstances where the plaintiff fully litigated the Labor Code violations in arbitration with a final award against them.

Baker v. Bay Area Toll Authority 6/5/26 CA1/1

The Rule of Baker v. Bay Area Toll Authority is that issue preclusion bars relitigation of statute of limitations arguments that were actually litigated and necessarily decided in a prior CEQA action, even when those arguments are raised in a subsequent lawsuit based on allegedly new project components, under circumstances where the party failed to appeal the prior adverse ruling and the new allegations do not establish a genuinely different project under CEQA.