California Legal Brief

AI-Generated Practitioner Briefs of California Appellate Opinions

remote rental

1 opinion tagged “remote rental”

Tavares v. Zipcar, Inc., et al. 1/30/26 CA3

The Rule of Tavares v. Zipcar is that remote rental car companies exempt under Civil Code section 1939.37 owe no duty to assess whether renters appear impaired at the time of rental or to equip vehicles with impairment detection technology, under circumstances where the rental is conducted through a membership agreement allowing remote vehicle access without in-person employee interaction.